Marbury+Vs.+Madison

 Marbury Vs. Madison
====Marbury VS Madison was a court case arguing if John Adams was allowed to appoint a bunch of Federalist judges that could rule the court systems in the same view as he had, so laws and the constitution could be viewed from his party’s point of view. During this time, many people had many different views on the constitution and how it could be interpreted, making it very confusing to have definite laws. The two political parties during this time had two very different views on the constitution and how it should be interpreted, and John Adams wanted to have his party rule the court systems and appointed judges who viewed politics the same as he did to rule the courts. Madison (an advocate for Jefferson) said that Adams bills were unconstitutional. The whole situation went to court, and the final decision was that it was unconstitutional. ====

Thesis: This court case brought the nation together. It made it so both political parties had a lot more to do with eachother, and in a sense brought them together. Sources: "John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, and Judicial Review-How the Court Became Supreme | EDSITEment." //John Marshall, Marbury v. Madison, and Judicial Review-How the Court Became Supreme | EDSITEment//. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2012. . "FindLaw | Legal Commentary." //FindLaw's Writ//. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2012. .

"Advertisement." //American Bar Association//. N.p., n.d. Web. 01 Oct. 2012. .